Files
next-ai-draw-io/NOTICE

53 lines
2.3 KiB
Plaintext
Raw Normal View History

feat(diagram-engine): wire up restructure_diagram + stencil catalog Closes the loop: the model can now build and edit AWS architecture diagrams by declaring structure, and never writes an mxCell again. catalog.ts — 983 AWS icon and 19 group stencils as a name→style map, generated from drawio-ai-kit's catalog (itself generated from jgraph's draw.io shape index). Styles are verbatim, so the official category colours, connection points and aspect=fixed come along for free and nothing is hand-assembled. An invented name is rejected with suggestions instead of rendering as a blank square, which is what draw.io does with an unknown resIcon today. operations.ts — what the model actually sends: add_icon / add_container / move / link / set_dir and so on, applied in order against the tree. Guards the things that break a diagram quietly: duplicate ids (draw.io drops one of the two cells), edges left pointing at a removed node, and moving a container inside itself. index.ts — the entry point. current XML → parse → apply ops → check names → layout → render → new XML. The tree is not stored between calls; it is re-derived from the canvas every time, so a user's manual edits are input to the next layout rather than state to reconcile. Token cost, measured with Claude's tokenizer rather than estimated: - build a VPC diagram: 515 tok as operations vs 3180 as XML (6.2x) - add one icon: 27 tok as an operation vs 3823 re-emitting (142x) - read current state: 216 tok as an outline vs 3180 as XML (14.7x) The 142x is the one that matters day to day: "add a Redis" is one operation, not a rewrite of the whole diagram. Routing in the system prompt sends AWS architecture through this path and leaves flowcharts, BPMN, sequence diagrams, mind maps and Azure/GCP on display_diagram — the layout engine's primitives (nested rows, columns, grids) do not model a sequence diagram's lifelines or a mind map's radial spread, and pretending otherwise would make those worse rather than better. Also: added a NOTICE recording the MIT port and the AWS Architecture Icons terms, and a narrow .gitignore exception so the generated catalog is tracked while the root data/ directory (admin settings, contains secrets) stays ignored. 403 unit tests + 3 new e2e. Verified in the real app: a structural tool call renders with real stencils and container markers; a second call adds one node and keeps everything from the first; an invented name is refused and nothing is drawn. The 13 existing diagram e2e tests still pass.
2026-08-09 12:13:54 +09:00
next-ai-draw-io
Copyright the next-ai-draw-io contributors
This product includes software developed by third parties, as set out below.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
lib/diagram-engine/ — layout and rendering
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The declarative layout algorithm (bottom-up measure, top-down place, sibling
feat(diagram-engine): flowcharts, swimlanes, sequence diagrams and mind maps Extends the declarative engine past cloud architecture. The tool routing was divided by icon library — AWS through the engine, everything else hand-written XML — which is the wrong axis. What matters is the LAYOUT SHAPE. Measured first: a six-step approval flow declared in its natural order comes out as one column, because the layout only arranges what nesting tells it to and never looked at the arrows. That forces the arrow from the decision to its second branch to jump over the first branch. graph.ts computes what the layout should have looked at: layer assignment by longest path, cycle breaking so a loop is drawn without setting the order, and barycentre sweeping to cut edge crossings. It emits ordinary container operations, so layout, routing and round-tripping are unchanged — reaching zero arrows-through-boxes on a 14-node pipeline and zero crossings on a bipartite graph whose declared order forces three. Three new container kinds, each because one layout rule cannot serve them all: pool — swimlanes. Lanes are real cells and each step is parented to its band, so dragging a step to another role records the change. sequence — participants across the top, one lifeline cell per participant so head and line stay together on a drag. Messages bypass the router: a message's height IS its order. radial — mind maps and org charts. Children are a flat list and the hierarchy comes from the links, because a branch is a box and a box cannot hold children. Flowchart box shapes (diamond, stadium, parallelogram, document) so a reader can tell a branch from a step. Two bugs the new tests caught: the duplicate-link guard blocked a sequence diagram from having two messages between the same pair, and the fallback message numbering was shared across containers, pushing a second diagram's messages off its own lifelines. 523 unit tests and 17 diagram e2e tests pass. Every kind verified round-trip stable to a fixed point, and rendered in a real browser — draw.io keeps the lifeline shape and the lane markers.
2026-08-09 13:47:23 +09:00
size equalisation), the swimlane-pool geometry, and the mxCell/style emission in
`lib/diagram-engine/layout.ts` and `lib/diagram-engine/render.ts` are derived
from drawio-ai-kit:
feat(diagram-engine): wire up restructure_diagram + stencil catalog Closes the loop: the model can now build and edit AWS architecture diagrams by declaring structure, and never writes an mxCell again. catalog.ts — 983 AWS icon and 19 group stencils as a name→style map, generated from drawio-ai-kit's catalog (itself generated from jgraph's draw.io shape index). Styles are verbatim, so the official category colours, connection points and aspect=fixed come along for free and nothing is hand-assembled. An invented name is rejected with suggestions instead of rendering as a blank square, which is what draw.io does with an unknown resIcon today. operations.ts — what the model actually sends: add_icon / add_container / move / link / set_dir and so on, applied in order against the tree. Guards the things that break a diagram quietly: duplicate ids (draw.io drops one of the two cells), edges left pointing at a removed node, and moving a container inside itself. index.ts — the entry point. current XML → parse → apply ops → check names → layout → render → new XML. The tree is not stored between calls; it is re-derived from the canvas every time, so a user's manual edits are input to the next layout rather than state to reconcile. Token cost, measured with Claude's tokenizer rather than estimated: - build a VPC diagram: 515 tok as operations vs 3180 as XML (6.2x) - add one icon: 27 tok as an operation vs 3823 re-emitting (142x) - read current state: 216 tok as an outline vs 3180 as XML (14.7x) The 142x is the one that matters day to day: "add a Redis" is one operation, not a rewrite of the whole diagram. Routing in the system prompt sends AWS architecture through this path and leaves flowcharts, BPMN, sequence diagrams, mind maps and Azure/GCP on display_diagram — the layout engine's primitives (nested rows, columns, grids) do not model a sequence diagram's lifelines or a mind map's radial spread, and pretending otherwise would make those worse rather than better. Also: added a NOTICE recording the MIT port and the AWS Architecture Icons terms, and a narrow .gitignore exception so the generated catalog is tracked while the root data/ directory (admin settings, contains secrets) stays ignored. 403 unit tests + 3 new e2e. Verified in the real app: a structural tool call renders with real stencils and container markers; a second call adds one node and keeps everything from the first; an invented name is refused and nothing is drawn. The 13 existing diagram e2e tests still pass.
2026-08-09 12:13:54 +09:00
https://github.com/sparklabx/drawio-ai-kit
Copyright (c) sparklabx
Licensed under the MIT License
feat(diagram-engine): flowcharts, swimlanes, sequence diagrams and mind maps Extends the declarative engine past cloud architecture. The tool routing was divided by icon library — AWS through the engine, everything else hand-written XML — which is the wrong axis. What matters is the LAYOUT SHAPE. Measured first: a six-step approval flow declared in its natural order comes out as one column, because the layout only arranges what nesting tells it to and never looked at the arrows. That forces the arrow from the decision to its second branch to jump over the first branch. graph.ts computes what the layout should have looked at: layer assignment by longest path, cycle breaking so a loop is drawn without setting the order, and barycentre sweeping to cut edge crossings. It emits ordinary container operations, so layout, routing and round-tripping are unchanged — reaching zero arrows-through-boxes on a 14-node pipeline and zero crossings on a bipartite graph whose declared order forces three. Three new container kinds, each because one layout rule cannot serve them all: pool — swimlanes. Lanes are real cells and each step is parented to its band, so dragging a step to another role records the change. sequence — participants across the top, one lifeline cell per participant so head and line stay together on a drag. Messages bypass the router: a message's height IS its order. radial — mind maps and org charts. Children are a flat list and the hierarchy comes from the links, because a branch is a box and a box cannot hold children. Flowchart box shapes (diamond, stadium, parallelogram, document) so a reader can tell a branch from a step. Two bugs the new tests caught: the duplicate-link guard blocked a sequence diagram from having two messages between the same pair, and the fallback message numbering was shared across containers, pushing a second diagram's messages off its own lifelines. 523 unit tests and 17 diagram e2e tests pass. Every kind verified round-trip stable to a fixed point, and rendered in a real browser — draw.io keeps the lifeline shape and the lane markers.
2026-08-09 13:47:23 +09:00
Original to this repository:
- the XML→tree reverse parser (`parse.ts`), which that project does not have
- the style-marker scheme (`markers.ts`) that lets structure survive a
round-trip through the draw.io editor
- the structural-operations layer (`operations.ts`)
- the invisible-container approach that replaces that project's "phantom" nodes
- the edge router (`route.ts`)
- the graph→layers pass (`graph.ts`): layer assignment, cycle breaking and
barycentre crossing reduction, which turn a flat node/arrow list into a
flowchart
- the sequence-diagram and radial (mind map / org chart) layouts
feat(diagram-engine): wire up restructure_diagram + stencil catalog Closes the loop: the model can now build and edit AWS architecture diagrams by declaring structure, and never writes an mxCell again. catalog.ts — 983 AWS icon and 19 group stencils as a name→style map, generated from drawio-ai-kit's catalog (itself generated from jgraph's draw.io shape index). Styles are verbatim, so the official category colours, connection points and aspect=fixed come along for free and nothing is hand-assembled. An invented name is rejected with suggestions instead of rendering as a blank square, which is what draw.io does with an unknown resIcon today. operations.ts — what the model actually sends: add_icon / add_container / move / link / set_dir and so on, applied in order against the tree. Guards the things that break a diagram quietly: duplicate ids (draw.io drops one of the two cells), edges left pointing at a removed node, and moving a container inside itself. index.ts — the entry point. current XML → parse → apply ops → check names → layout → render → new XML. The tree is not stored between calls; it is re-derived from the canvas every time, so a user's manual edits are input to the next layout rather than state to reconcile. Token cost, measured with Claude's tokenizer rather than estimated: - build a VPC diagram: 515 tok as operations vs 3180 as XML (6.2x) - add one icon: 27 tok as an operation vs 3823 re-emitting (142x) - read current state: 216 tok as an outline vs 3180 as XML (14.7x) The 142x is the one that matters day to day: "add a Redis" is one operation, not a rewrite of the whole diagram. Routing in the system prompt sends AWS architecture through this path and leaves flowcharts, BPMN, sequence diagrams, mind maps and Azure/GCP on display_diagram — the layout engine's primitives (nested rows, columns, grids) do not model a sequence diagram's lifelines or a mind map's radial spread, and pretending otherwise would make those worse rather than better. Also: added a NOTICE recording the MIT port and the AWS Architecture Icons terms, and a narrow .gitignore exception so the generated catalog is tracked while the root data/ directory (admin settings, contains secrets) stays ignored. 403 unit tests + 3 new e2e. Verified in the real app: a structural tool call renders with real stencils and container markers; a second call adds one node and keeps everything from the first; an invented name is refused and nothing is drawn. The 13 existing diagram e2e tests still pass.
2026-08-09 12:13:54 +09:00
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
lib/diagram-engine/data/aws-stencils.json — stencil catalog
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
A name→style map for the mxgraph.aws4 stencil family, generated from
drawio-ai-kit's `catalog/aws.json`, which in turn was generated from the draw.io
shape index published by jgraph:
https://github.com/jgraph/drawio-mcp
Copyright (c) JGraph Ltd
Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0
The style strings are reproduced verbatim from that index. They reference the
official AWS Architecture Icons, which are trademarks of Amazon Web Services and
are NOT covered by this repository's licence. Their use is governed by the AWS
Architecture Icons terms:
https://aws.amazon.com/architecture/icons/
The catalog contains stencil *names and style strings* only — it does not embed
any AWS icon artwork. draw.io supplies the artwork at render time.